<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Thing About Facebook&#8217;s FriendFeed Acquisition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chryswu.com/blog/2009/08/12/the-thing-about-facebooks-friendfeed-acquisition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chryswu.com/blog/2009/08/12/the-thing-about-facebooks-friendfeed-acquisition/</link>
	<description>Where Ideas For Online News Bounce Around</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:26:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison Rowland</title>
		<link>http://www.chryswu.com/blog/2009/08/12/the-thing-about-facebooks-friendfeed-acquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison Rowland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chryswu.com/blog/?p=747#comment-263</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure you&#039;re correct about the cookies being used to glean more data about users. Cookies can only be detected or read by the issuing website. The only exception to that is third-party cookies (usually from advertisers), which are placed via remote loading of content (such as a banner ad), and which that third party could use to track which of the participating websites you visited. Facebook and FriendFeed still can&#039;t access that data unless it&#039;s supplied to them by some third party with whom they have a relationship.

In addition, acceptance of third-party cookies can be turned off in your browser, and it is off by default in Safari. See the link below for more info.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/16/AR2005071600111.html

If I&#039;m off-base on this, I&#039;d be interested to understand more about how the interplay of the sites and third-party cookies could work to increase spying on users.&lt;p class=&quot;top-comments&quot;&gt;Current score: &lt;span class=&quot;top-comments-karma&quot; id=&quot;karma-263&quot;&gt;0&lt;/span&gt; &lt;small&gt;(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure you&#8217;re correct about the cookies being used to glean more data about users. Cookies can only be detected or read by the issuing website. The only exception to that is third-party cookies (usually from advertisers), which are placed via remote loading of content (such as a banner ad), and which that third party could use to track which of the participating websites you visited. Facebook and FriendFeed still can&#8217;t access that data unless it&#8217;s supplied to them by some third party with whom they have a relationship.</p>
<p>In addition, acceptance of third-party cookies can be turned off in your browser, and it is off by default in Safari. See the link below for more info.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/16/AR2005071600111.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/16/AR2005071600111.html</a></p>
<p>If I&#8217;m off-base on this, I&#8217;d be interested to understand more about how the interplay of the sites and third-party cookies could work to increase spying on users.
<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-263">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
